Pangu Pati Splits: what happens now?

Pangu Pati MPs travelling to the opposition camp

Pangu Pati, the leading coalition partner in the current PNG government has split. My test for a successful government change in PNG is when there is a significant split with the ruling coalition party. This is because the ruling coalition party is usually the biggest party. Currently Pangu has 59 MPs, about half of PNG’s seats in parliament.

Now that Pangu has spilt, what happens next?

Pangu Split: What Happens Now?

  1. The Deputy Speaker has instructed the opposition to submit a new notice for a vote of no confidence. The first step for the opposition is to decide on a candidate for Prime Minister between tonight and Tuesday.
  2. On Tuesday, when Parliament meets, the opposition will submit a new notice for a vote of no confidence against Prime Minister James Marape.
  3. The notice must include the name of the alternate Prime Minister, a reason of national interest for the vote, and must be signed by 10% of the MPs in the PNG Parliament (10% of 118 MPs).
  4. The Parliament Business Committee will meet at lunchtime on Wednesday to review the notice. Their sole responsibility is to ensure the notice meets the technical requirements outlined in point 3.
  5. On Thursday, Parliament will be informed of the notice as the first order of business and then adjourn for a week. By the following Thursday, June 4, a new Prime Minister could be in place if the opposition is successful.
  6. The process may not be straightforward. The government-dominated Parliament Business Committee might delay the meeting on Wednesday. Additionally, the government could persuade an MP who signed the motion to switch sides, invalidating the motion, as seen with Gordon Wesley.
  7. If the government changes, the new Prime Minister will have an 18-month grace period starting June 4, 2024.
  8. If James Marape retains his seat, he will not be protected by a grace period, allowing the opposition to mount repeated votes of no confidence.
  9. The period between now and June 4 is long, and in PNG politics, many unforeseen events can occur. Thus, predicting an outcome is highly uncertain.

A change in the prime minister’s position is needed given the chaotic rule of James Marape. But will the next prime minister be any better? That answer lies in who the next prime minister will be. The prime minister’s seat has to go to Allan Bird for there to be any hope of change.

Social media activists in a politicised bureaucracy

Samson Komati, activist and political commentator arrested and refused bail

Samson Komati’s arrest is reminiscent of Bryan Kramer’s arrest when he wasn’t a MP yet. We have come full circle under two prime minister’s where social media activists are arrested and jailed.

Here are a few things to remember as a social media commentator:

  1. Employees

If you have a complaint as a public servant, or if you have evidence of corruption or wrong doing, don’t post on social media. Use the procedures laid out in the Whistleblower’s Act, and lodge your complaints with the police, Ombudsman Commission or ICAC.

If it’s a “leader” as defined under the Leadership Code, make the complaint to the Ombudsman Commission. If he’s not a public official, or CEO of a company, go to ICAC or police.

ICAC and police can deal with all corrupt cases whilst Ombudsman Commission can only deal with those leaders currently occupying office.

Between ICAC and police, ICAC commissioners are all non-Papua New Guineans so potentially not politically affiliated. It’s still new so we don’t know how effective it will be.

If you post on social media, it’s not a formal complaint and no authority is required to investigate. Police can, but ICAC and OC don’t have to.

  1. Private Citizen

Say you’re not employed and have nothing to loose. You don’t need Whistleblower law’s protection, and you can basically go through the same agencies listed above.

  1. So what about social media?

Social media is proving to be more vibrant than traditional media in holding leaders accountable. Leaders are forced to respond when a post goes viral.

But social media doesn’t have an editor that ensures the information is correct. It opens you up to potential prosecution. It’s better to post facts that can be traced back to a legitimate source that is publicly available. For instance, if you claim someone owns a company we can search on Investment Promotion Authority website and verify it.

That’s a claim that is based on a legitimate source and is publicly available.

But if you say someone got paid corruptly, and the finance department does have a copy of the signed cheque, but it’s not on finance department’s website, it’s not publicly available even though it’s possibly a true claim. Finance department’s records are a legitimate source but it’s not public.

  1. Don’t get into a fight with the judiciary

I whatever you do, stay the hell out of the judiciary’s way. It’s a terrible idea to criticise a judge, and stand before and judge, to be judged.

PNG has 11 million people. Pick on one of them, not the judges.

I’m not saying it’s fair, I’m saying it’s a terrible idea, and record shows it’s a terrible idea. Ask Brian Kramer on how he was dismissed from office.

  1. Is it worth it?

I know we all want to be corruption fighters, but ask yourself if it’s worth it. If you’re the bread winner, leave the politics to others. It’s not worth it. Politicians never last. The one you mad at will be replaced. Or as always is the case, the corruption fighting politician you’re supporting with be on the same side as the corrupt politician you both are fighting to get rid off. All politicians are friends at some level. The people are used as tools of advocacy. It’s a caucus.

A new government in PNG is always formed from within

Rainbow Paita, MP for Finchaffen Open and senior minister in the Marape coalition

Rainbow Paita’s name often floats around when there is an attempt at vote of no confidence, either as an operative or candidate for the prime minister’s position. Paita has all the qualities for a PNG prime minister, but it’s not the qualities you are thinking of:

  1. Prime Ministers in PNG are changed from within

Almost all governments in PNG are changed from within. And this goes all the way back to Chan replacing Somare in the first vote of no confidence in early 80s to Marape filling the vacancy in 2019 when O’Neill resigned to avoid humiliation of a vote of no confidence. Paita is part of the “inside” team of Pangu and government caucus. It wouldn’t be a surprise, and if he emerges as a contender.

  1. Ambiguous

Clearly principled politicans rarely get the high post. PNG is a prime Melanesian case where ambiguities and consensus and compromise reigns. If you are a Gary Juffa or a Brian Kramer or an Allan Bird, you have set yourself a very clear high standard. Public expectations for you to play by the rules is very high, otherwise you’d appear to be the embodiment of hypocrisy. This is why all three men have no followers in parliament: either one men party or no party men.

PNG’s politicans are so forgiving: they criticise each other, and then get together, forgive each other, and get along. This was the case with Peter O’Neill (remember Douglas Tomurisea saying sorry to O’Neill with the life of an innocent pig?) and Marape (remember the photo of Marape and William Duma hugging after Duma failed to replace Marape as a PM candidate and then voted him as PM, only to “slide unconsciously” to and fro? – Duma’s own words)

Rainbow Paita is from the same fabric as Peter O’Neill and James Marape. He’s the type that would work with his enemies and forgive others in the name of advancing the coalition’s interests.

Don’t get me wrong: this is not the preferred type of leadership. A principled government or prime minister is always preferable, it’s just that it doesn’t make you the prime minister in PNG.

  1. Anyone but Marape or O’Neill

By now, Papua New Guineans just want the prime minister replaced. It doesn’t matter who, so long as it’s not Marape or O’Neill. If you have the ability to break the government, you get the social liscense of the populace, and therefore, their MPs’ support.

  1. My preference would still be Allan Bird. But for that to happen, we need a miracle of biblical proportion. MPs who’d put the national interest first.

The views expressed here doesn’t claim Rainbow Paita is confirmed to be contesting the prime minister’s position. It’s all social media rumours. The point of this piece is that for one to become a prime minister in PNG, you’d need a Rainbo-like characteristics. It’s not the preferred characteristics, but historically it’s the type that maketh the prime minister.

IMF and World Bank WRONG about PNG – Allan Bird

Alternate Prime Minister Allan Bird

Its time to Take PNG Forward

I disagree with the position of the IMF and World Bank in relation to the devaluation of the Kina now under way.

The IMF believes that by depreciating the Kina, this will encourage exports and make PNG production cheaper. In fact the opposite is true.

In the last 49 years, the PNG economy has not diversified much and therefore a significant depreciation is not going to automatically result in increased production and exports. We had a significant depreciation 24 years ago and that did not result in any significant increases of production in anything. It just led to more hardship for ordinary people.

This is because PNG has not invested in the productive capacity of the economy, hence it is not possible to increase production. Only the extractive sector is able to do that but almost all of them are operating at peak or declining capacity.

I just saw a 10kg bag of rice increase from K50 to K56 a bag. This is the second price increase this year. Depreciation is already hurting our ordinary people. While some low income earners are getting a tax break, the vast majority of our people in the informal sector cannot access similar assistance.

The Marape government in chasing cheap loans from IMF/WB and having resorted to printing money may have unknowingly placed a rope around the necks of ordinary citizens.

I believe a reasonable trading band of around 30 USc and 40 AUc is what we should be aiming for.

As I wrote in my previous article, we must restrain government borrowings and improve fiscal discipline. We must live within our means.

We must also redirect spending not just on economic enablers but also on the productive capacity of the various sectors. We must also look at tax incentives to encourage private sector investment to help diversify our economy.

We must decentralize our government structure as a means of encouraging spread of private sector investments. The engine room for growth is in the provinces, not in Waigani.

We must have a smaller central government that oversees provinces and doesn’t compete with them.

We need to expand private sector investment and support private sector to grow both the economy and jobs. It is not government that grows the economy, private sector does that. Too much government control, coupled with corruption is killing our economy.

The Marape Government has borrowed K32 billion in 5 years but they have only proven that government is incapable of growing the economy because economic growth has simply lagged behind government borrowing. I hope all current and future leaders learn something from this grave mistake and not repeat it in the future.

We have a situation in our country where the government thinks it should be running businesses and it fails miserably. We should focus on governing and leave business to the private sector.

It’s time for a reset. Marape has taken PNG backwards by 20 years. It’s time to take PNG forward.

PNG IS NOT PRINTING MONEY – Government responds to Allan Bird

Ian Ling-Stucky

Press statement

Once again, the Opposition is trying to mislead the people of PNG. A number of their recent statements claim that PNG is printing money to fund the budget deficit, stated the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Treasury Matters, Ian Ling-Stuckey.

“This is just wrong.The IMF verifies this is wrong. It is a condition in the IMF program that PNG does not print money to finance the deficit. When we pass an IMF review, as we have just done again with the recent IMF mission, this means we have not printed money. This is not an imposed condition from outside – it is a condition that the Marape-Rosso Government believes in. And once this claim of printing money is proven to be false, then the rest of their arguments collapse with no credibility.

“Of course, the new Opposition may be remembering the disastrous budget management of their old Opposition friends. PNG did print money – known as the “slack” arrangement during 2014 to 2016. This was at a time when economic mismanagement had led to a massive blowout in budget deficits – from a planned budget surplus in 2012 to a budget deficit of K3,278m or 10.4% of GDP in 2013, K3,579m or 9.5% of GDP in 2014, K2,785m or 7.0% of GDP in 2015 and K3,087m in 2016. No budget repair going on through those years! The only trick in 2017 was to revalue the size of GDP by 50% – just made their budget deficit to GDP figures look just a little bit better.

“These high deficits and rapidly growing debt, which was 2.5 times larger in just 4 years, meant the O’Neill government was struggling to finance such huge deficits. Domestic interest costs had risen to over 12% for government bonds, there was no credible budget repair program in place to attract low-cost international financing, Treasury Bond auctions kept failing. Reports suggest the Government at the time forced BPNG to start printing money, even though it was probably illegal for them to do so.

“In contrast to the above desperate situation, the budget is now in a much better position. Domestic interest costs on government bonds have dropped from 12% to 6%. There is a credible and performing 13 Year Budget Repair Plan that has reduced the debt to GDP ratio from 8.9% of GDP in 2020 during COVID, down to 4.3% in 2023 and on track for a surplus by 2027. Treasury Bond financing was regularly oversubscribed during 2023 despite offering lower interest rates, and we are well ahead of pro-rata raisings in 2024. The Marape Government introduced changes to the Central Banking Act which made very clear that printing money in times such as 2014 to 2016 is illegal. Absolute limits on the size of BPNG holdings of government securities have been introduced and put into the new CBA laws. These are being monitored by the independent IMF.

“The Marape-Rosso Government worked hard to fix the errors of the previous government. The performance over the last five years is so much better. The Opposition claims we should exercise fiscal restraint. We are. We are cutting the budget deficit by a billion Kina a year. PNG’s rate of budget repair is ranked in the top 10% of all countries in the world. This is the right balance between repairing the budget, and not causing unnecessary hardship to our families by cutting even harder. The Marape-Rosso Government understands the budget problem, and has demonstrated the courage to deal with it.”

Hon. Ian Ling-Stuckey, CMG. MP
Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Treasury Matters
12 May 2024

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started