Know your people. Get their trust. Ask for their vote.

Female candidates for the NCD seats_2022

Disclaimer: if your goal is advocacy for women’s rights, please don’t read this article. It will offend you. If you get offended easily, don’t read. But if your goal is “winning” an election in PNG as a women read on.

There are the idealistic, modern, Western way of doing things. And then there is the PNG or Melanesian Way of doing things. For those of us who live our lives between two cultures, we learn to act appropriately depending on where we are.

I know of women, some of them my colleagues and some sisters, who are highly educated. They are the classic modern women. In Port Moresby or Australia, they live the modern women they are.

But when they go back to their villages, they take their place as delegated by hundreds of years of customary conventions. Conventions which says the men are the head. Brothers own the land. And where they consult their brothers and fathers and elders before they make decisions that affect the village.

This is where I’m going with this post: in PNG, more than 80% of the voters are rural based. Where life is governed by culture more than formal laws.

Both the educated and those not educated in the Western curriculum have one vote each. This means those in rural areas dominate PNG elections.

These are voters who have no frame of reference for concepts like “equality”.

Even those that are educated in the Western, modern, idealistic ways are very much internally regulated by their cultural upbringing. Everyone in PNG has a village they belong to, or were raised by parents who grew up in the village.

So to win elections in PNG, one has to think, act, and do what the voters tell you.

This means female voters have to go back to their villages and/or communities way before elections, an get the consent of the tribal elders. They need the support of men more than the women. Women in rural villages do what their husbands tell them. This is the reality.

If women in rural areas made their own decisions, or if their decisions were informed by the idealistic, modern, Western concepts, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

Women in PNG don’t vote female MPs. That should tell you how strong of a culture you come up against. Even if women were free to make their own decisions, they would choose men over women. Actually they do that.

In an earlier article titled “Conversations with PNG female Politicians” we talked about our conversations with current (Bougainville) and former (PNG) female candidates. When asked these women about their experiences. The attributed their success to the leadership and influence of men during the campaign phase.

What you would call toxic masculinity is sometimes an asset for elections if you learn to use it to your advantage. Study the prevailing cultural imperatives, align your strategies, and campaign. Don’t ever raise the equality argument. You will not find sympathisers for equality in the rural areas, and even in cities.

We all want you to win.

Second, listen carefully to how Papua New Guineans define leadership. Many will tell you they trust the individual who has lived with them in their communities, and has had “Han Mak” – that is, implemented small projects to improve the livelihood of the community.

During dry seasons, or disaster, go out of your way and buy supplies for your village. Assist in any way you can. Doesn’t have to be huge a contribution. Make yourself “visible.”

Policies and plans do not matter in rural electorates. To them, talk is less important than action. “Doing” rather than “saying” matters.

Winning an election is a long hard road. Know your people. Know your place. Become one of them. Get their trust. Only then, ask for their votes.

There is no question that we need more women in parliament. But to win, we need to follow the cultural imperatives.

If your goal is advocacy, then don’t follow this advice. After all, you are an independent individual, with equality guaranteed by the constitution. You don’t need anyone’s permission. Not even men. Or your clan.

But if your goal is winning an election, one where your voters have agreed norms and practises, you must abide by it. This is a game where you are at the mercy of the voters decision. They decide your fate.

After you win, and have the national platform, you then can advocate for change. Not drastic change because you don’t want to risk losing the next election. But a gradual, incremental change.

It’s a long journey before we reach that idealistic, modern, Western form of democracy and equality. Especially the electoral bit. For now, let’s take the long route.

There will be some asking what about corruption and foul play, or intimidation and violence? We’ll, these offences are mostly committed by men. So until we have a free and fair election, you need men’s support to help you get past these things (and at other times, may even commit these offences for you – bitter truth is they will).

Urban seats may be slightly different. But the role of men for female candidates’ success is as important in the urban areas. And also remember that even in urban areas, cultural dictates prevail.

This is a personal take. But where I come from, this is not very far from the truth.

Don’t Just Complain: Do something about like

Don’t just complain, do something about it. But be strategic: Lessons from Elon Musk buying controlling stake in Twitter.

Elon Musk recently bought 9.2% of Twitter, becoming the biggest share holder. To give some idea of how crazy that is, Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter only owns 2.2%. Musk owns 7% more shares of Twitter than the founder of Twitter!

First Musk complained of Twitter sanctioning free speech. Twitter continued to cancel those that they disagreed with.

Second he ran a survey on whether Twitter was being fair. 70% of the 2 million said Twitter was not fair (I voted saying it was not fair 😂).

Third Musk then considered whether to create a new platform or buy controlling stake in Twitter. Decided to buy controlling stake instead.

Fourth he buys controlling stake. Now he can direct Twitter to the direction he wants.

Lesson 1: Dont just complain. Do something about it. But be strategic.

Lesson 2: You don’t have to start your own business to own it

Elon Musk now owns a controlling stake in a company he did create. Very much like Warren Buffet, who gets more out of Apple and Coke than the CEOs of these two companies.

You don’t have to start your own business to own it. Let the entrepreneurs start it. Let those who have the means and know how do it. Let the best management run the business. All you need is save up, consistently buy shares, re-invest the dividends, and increase your stake.

There are great business brains out there. You don’t have to be a genius as they are to be rich. You need to be disciplined, focused, and consistent in investing.

Save. Invest. Reinvest. Hold for long term. And Be Rich.

#investing #entrepreneurs #business #sharemarket

Thunder without Rain: PNG Politics

One of the things you need to master in PNG politics is to understand subtleties and slips up during conversations, figurative speeches, presents, or presentations. It’s called “Tok-Bokis.”

Once, a former governor MP was given a traditional bilum (bag) full of corns, and a bounded green lizard by villagers during a ceremony he was invited to witness.

The ignorant governor took the present believing the electorate was happy with his performance.

The gifts had a meaning. Corn signified the Tok Pisin language “kon”, loosely translated “lies or unfulfilled promises.”

The lizard’s tongue splits into two at the edge. It signified that you mustn’t promise that which you won’t do.

Don’t be like the green lizard, or “kundu palai” as it is known in PNG. Don’t have a double-tongue. Say what you mean, and do what you say.

The presents were a way of the villagers saying the MP doesn’t keep his promises: unfulfilled promises during elections; and changing positions on issues he campaigned on when it became convenient.

There’s another popular Tok-Bokis you hear around this election time.

THUNDER WITHOUT RAIN

Basically it’s used to associate a MP who is very vocal and speaks out on national issues, but his province or district suffers from basic necessities.

Note to non-PNG readers: PNG voters see the primary role of their MPs as service delivery, not law makers. This means you can be vocal on important national issues and still lose your voters’ trust if you do not deliver services like road, ports, hospitals, schools and so forth.

You cannot blame the voters for prioritising service delivery over national issues. The reform in 1995 that abolished the provincial representatives also brought the responsibility of running the province under the ambit of the National MPs. Now they have the dual responsibility of service delivery as well as national responsibilities.

If a MP focuses on national issues but fails to deliver services, he is referred to as Thunder without Rain or Lighting without Showers. You can see him on television and make newspaper headlines, but he’s never delivered services.

We’d had few vocal MPs in this parliament, who are accused of being just Thunders. It’s interesting to see how it plays out in the elections.

Ranking PNG’s top 3 Ideal Prime Ministers

Dr Alan Marat

Ranking PNG’s IDEAL Prime Ministers

Who would you like to see become PNG’s Prime Minister? Below are politicians we think are PM material, ranking the top three (3) candidates. We also give reasons for why we think they are the best.

  1. Dr Alan Marat of Melanesian Liberal Party

There’s probably only one true statesman in PNG parliament (with the passing of Sir Mek): Dr Alan Marat. Marat has serviced in senior ministerial positions including Ministry for Justice, served as Deputy PM, and served as Deputy Opposition Leader. He’s among the very few whose name has never been associated with corruption. And he is not known for switching sides when convenient. In all his debates, he carefully avoids name calling, and debates issues. He commands respect from both the opposition and government side. He takes the first position.

2. Alan Bird of National Alliance

Alan Bird as a governor cannot be PM. If he were to become PM he would have to relinquish his position as governor. Alan Bird’s debates are informed, and like Marat, focuses on issues and not individuals. Bird’s only problem has been that he was content to see Marape entertain garbage. How on earth did himself, Juffa, Kerenga Kua and Kramer let Basil return to the Deputy PM position in 2020 after he failed to change the government? These so called corruption fighters have also lived and dined in the same camp as those alleged of corruption. We have not seen the APEC report, the Masaratis, and Yoga funds. Even UBS report from Ombudsman Commission was not enough, we needed a new Commission of Inquiry. Bird, to his credit, has openly challenged the government he is part of on some issues. If we went for patriotism, Bird would take number 1 spot.

The sooner National Alliance realises that Patrick Prauitch is not a PM material the better for NA. Bird needs to get take over NA leadership.

3. Kerenga Kua of PNG National Party

Before 2019, Kua was up there with Marat. Since joining the government, he’s only been heard for his role in the negotiations for natural resources. He’s become silent for all practical reasons. That’s expected because he’s on the government side. But as stated above, he was content to accommodate alleged corruption among the government MPs. For Kua, Bird, Kramer and Juffa, keeping the government intact was more important than separating corrupt MPs and pushing for investigations. However, Kua and Marat remain the few real statesman.

  1. This section we’ll lump all the names of the rest: Juffa, Kramer, Basil, Marape & O’Neil. Kramer & Juffa are more of activist politicians than PM materials. They are more useful in the opposition keeping the government accountable. They serve the country well as opposition MPs.

You can make the argument that Niccolò Machiavelli “The Prince” was written for O’Neill & Marape: power hungry.

Whilst Basil & Prauitch take pride in being yoyo politicians.

Marape gave Foreign Affairs Ministry to Prauitch in exchange for Prauitch dropping the Constitutional challenge on the validity of Marape’s election. Marape also accepted Basil back as Deputy PM after Basil unsuccessful tried to replace him as PM in 2020. Marape will do everything under the sun to stay in power as PM.

O’Neill is, well he’s O’Neill. Cunning, irresponsible, and power hungry.

Don’t rule out the possibility of O’Neill & Marape joining forces post 2012. They have one thing in common: they love the PM’s post.

What about Namah? He lacks the temperament to be PM. Duma is a unconsciously sliding MP. Davis, Abel, Ian-Lingstucky, Temu would better serve as ministers or vice-ministers.

What do you think of our list. Comment below and let us know.

PNG Stop worshiping MPs

Finchaffen MP

This article follows from the earlier one titled “Guns, Criminals, Warlords & PNG MPs”. This one is a critique of Papua New Guineans tendency to be impressed by MPs.

After stepping down as Minister for National Planning, after video of him firing a military type high powered weapon went viral on social media, Paita apologized on his social media account (Facebook).

The post instantly drew widespread sympathy. Mostly from his followers, but few others as well, who probably don’t know that it’s a convention for representatives to resign if they engage in inappropriate action.

The question is whether Rainbow Paita should be praised for stepping down.

It really depends on which side you’re on, and how much you know about democratic convention (o practice). Elsewhere in developed democracies, MPs resign after such incidents. You are expected to resign. In fact, MPs resign over minor things.

For instance, in January 2018, Lord Bates, a British MP and government minister arrived late for parliament sitting. There was a question in parliament to him as a responsible minister. He was a few minutes late, and his first act was to notify parliament that he was resigning immediately for the “discourtesy of not being in place to answer the question” raised. His resignation was rejected by his peers later. But the point is: a government minister offered his resignation for just being late a few minutes.

In PNG, a government minister is praised for resigning after video of him firing high powered weapon goes viral on Facebook. See the difference?

People have to stop giving MPs too much praise.

A few days before that, photos circulated on social media of people somewhere in Port Moresby settlement carrying Powes Parkop on a chair. The worship of politicians in PNG is unparalleled.

There are questions police have to ask Rainbow Paita. In his FB post he claims he has a firearm lisence. Police have to ask whether the kind of license he holds allows him to handle military type weapons? If yes, what are the implications: can any citizen get a lisence and be eligible to handle high powered weapons? After all, every Papua New Guinean has equal rights as Paita. If his lisence allows him to handle high powered weapon, so does anyone in Morata or Busu or Tari. He says he fired the weapon in a private property. What does PNG laws say about target practice? Does any private property fall within the definition of environment acceptable for target practice? It may be that there is no such law, and that dislodging semi-automic weapon on private property is not illegal. After all, we are a country that cannot prosecute drug cartels because our laws don’t cover illicit drugs like cocaine and meth.

Rainbow only resigned because the video went viral. Not because he thinks what he did was unacceptable. If the video hadn’t gone viral, he wouldn’t have resigned.

His logic seems to be that: if what I’m doing doesn’t go viral on social it’s not wrong. Its only wrong when firing military type weapon goes viral on social media.

Papua New Guineans have to set a higher bar for their MPs. The standard is so low that MPs get praised for doing what is expected.

This is not an article intended to criticize Rainbow Paita. But to point out the insanity of a bar we set for ourselves. And the lack of critical thinking we posses.

On a positive not, it’s good to see Paita resign. But in a democracy, it’s supposed to be the norm, not an exception.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started